![]() There's also a library of softlib patches there too. It works under DOS, and gets rid of annoying features. I use the patch at downloads -> compilers -> Patches -> qb xp floppy patch. The vetusware file is called 'Gwbasic and Basica v 1.00 to 3.40', does not include v 4.00.Īctually, the 3.40 (OS/2 2.x+, 5.02) and 4.00 (dos 4.01) are both identical, the 3.40 is mastered from the 4.00 version, and the copyright/version string changed. Gwbasic-3.20-monocrome graphics (mbasic).rar Indepently of what basic version, i can list all basic variations i've got in my DOSCompilers Collection 0.2īeing impossible to me to know where these basics came exactly, i simply named them fromĬopyright messages, also in case of doubt i hex-examined the files looking for data I know it's not genuine and I don't really care, so it's not really within this site's scope, I don't think? MS-DOS 4.00 and 4.01 both come with GW-BASIC 3.23 this is the final version of GW-BASIC, and is not included in later versions of DOS.Īlso, I'm attempting to fill in my holes so that with every "genericized" DOS version I have, I have a corresponding "genericized" GWBASIC. MS-DOS 3.20 and 3.21 both come with GW-BASIC 3.20, which has been synchronized with BASICA 3.20.Ĩ. ![]() I have a "3.10, Zenith release 3.14" but Zenith MS-DOS 3.10, so far as I'm aware - or any Zenith MS-DOS - never came with GW-BASIC?!Ħ. (Epson MS-DOS 3.1, for example, still comes with a 2.02 BASIC.)ĥ. I have a "genericized" version of this which I believe is Epson's. MS-DOS 2.11 through early versions of 3.10 all seem to have come, if at all, with GW-BASIC 2.02. ![]() ![]() I have a "genericized" version of this as it should it only does the "proper" CGA modes.Ĥ. MS-DOS 2.01 would have come with GW-BASIC 2.01. I have this only in an Olivetti-customized variant the other 2.0 exemplar I have (Eagle) has a 1.x GWBASIC.ģ. MS-DOS 2.00 would have come with GW-BASIC 2.0 (as such). I have this only in a Corona-customized variant.Ģ. MS-DOS 1.25 would have come with GW-BASIC 1.12. I'm not sure how accurate this is, so bear with me.ġ. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |